Naomi Broady vs Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Broady vs M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger

Naomi Broady

GBR

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

1.89m

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

134

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

$330.0K

Career Money

$30.0K

Right-handed (one-handed backhand)

Plays

Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger

GEO

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

1.89m

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

134

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

$330.0K

Career Money

$30.0K

Right-handed (one-handed backhand)

Plays

Head-To-Head: Broady 1 - 1 Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger

They have played 5 sets in total, with Naomi Broady winning 3 and Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 2. The last match between Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger and Naomi Broady was at the Pozoblanco, 27-06-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Broady	1
Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger	1

Last H2H Matches:

(R1) Pozoblanco(06-27-11)

Stats

Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger

Naomi Broady

(QF) Grenoble(01-24-11)

Stats

Naomi Broady

Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger

N. Broady vs M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger H2H Profile

N. Broady	Stats	M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger
$329,987	Career Prize Money	$29,995
52.72% (378-339)	Career Total W/L	53.24% (304-267)
0	Hard	1
1	Indoor	0
9	Titles	10
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Broady vs M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naomi Broady has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naomi Broady, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Naomi Broady has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Naomi Broady has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Naomi Broady has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 111/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 38/ 56). Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 216/ 155), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
Player level: In the last year, Naomi Broady has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Naomi Broady winning 1 times and Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Naomi Broady winning 3 and Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 2. The last match between Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger and Naomi Broady was at the Pozoblanco, 27-06-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naomi Broady has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naomi Broady has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Naomi Broady has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Naomi Broady vs Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Broady vs M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Broady	Stats	M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	2
18	Games Won	18
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Broady Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Birmingham Classic - Birmingham - 14-06-2021
Q1 Kurumi NaraK. Nara	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
W15 Sharm El Sheikh - 22-02-2021
R2 Svenja OchsnerS. Ochsner	L	6-3 2-6 6-3	Stats
R1 Dasha PlekhanovaD. Plekhanova	W	7-5 6-4	Stats
W25 Potchefstroom - 15-02-2021
Q3 Alice RameA. Rame	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
Q1 Heike Janse Van VuurenH. Janse	W	6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Antalya - 12-12-2016
R1 Ulrikke EikeriU. Eikeri	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
Q3 Esen KokceE. Kokce	W	2-6 6-0 6-2	Stats
Telavi - 14-09-2015
R2 Polina NovikovaP. Novikova	L	7-6(10) 6-4	Stats
R1 Anna PribylovaA. Pribylova	W	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Beinasco - 23-02-2015
Q1 Tena LukasT. Lukas	W	6-1 7-6(1)	Stats

View All

N. Broady vs M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Broady	Stats	M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger
52.72% (378/339)	YTD Win/Loss	53.52% (304/264)
52.93% (886/788)	Sets Win/Loss	52.17% (686/629)
51.57% (8172/7674)	Games Win/Loss	50.84% (6109/5908)
53.94% (178/152)	Hard Win/Loss	48.96% (47/49)
50.98% (26/25)	Clay Win/Loss	58.22% (216/155)
56.20% (136/106)	Indoor Hard W/L	42.71% (41/55)
40.43% (38/56)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/5)
0.32	Aces Per Game	0.01
2453	Aces Total	67
0.17	Double Faults Per Game	0.04
1334	Total Double Faults	213
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
592.82	Average Opponent Rank	584.11
58% (12987/22487)	1st Serve %	62% (2372/3855)
72% (9360/12987)	1st Serve Win %	55% (1304/2372)
43% (4130/9500)	2nd Serve Win %	41% (615/1483)
42% (879/2079)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (193/413)
39% (8507/21701)	Return Points Win %	43% (1609/3719)
30.95% (13/29)	Slam W/L	18.18% (4/18)
38.89% (7/11)	Masters W/L	25.00% (1/3)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/3)
42.20% (46/63)	Main Tour W/L	38.78% (19/30)
54.37% (224/188)	Challenger W/L	54.78% (235/194)
64.71% (88/48)	Futures W/L	73.77% (45/16)
53% (373/709)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	53% (299/559)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	25% (1/4)
47% (104/220)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	48% (60/124)
45% (111/247)	Deciding Set Win %	55% (99/179)
81% (389/317)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (282/244)
18% (389/71)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (282/38)
18% (327/59)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (286/59)